The areas the investigation covers are:

• Usage of productivity features like email templates, call backs, automatic sending of CV’s and interviews.

  • Creation of custom templates and usage to gain the productivity advantage

  • Check of standard templates to see usage

• Use of Insights (feedback, scoring and likes) 

  • Feedback: Saving feedback from consultant and client interviews means interview data is available in future assignments and helps to get a clear picture of the candidate.  If this is not being used it would give a basic improvement of reducing time to placement

  • Scoring:  Ideal for matching clients top 5 requirements to candidates and feeding back to clients in a shortlist report.  Improves service to customers and a good way of tracking and storing candidate abilities.

• Using Custom list views to make Invenias work the way they want and makes user adoption and utility easier

• Global list views will be assessed for utility including GDPR for territories that use it

• GDPR usage for territories that have a requirement. Is it being used correctly to ensure conformance

• Categories:  Are there too many for the consultants to use, some not used and can some be consolidated.  Comprehensive saving of interview data in categories means simple category searches give validated results for future assignments search

• Research Functions: are they being used.  Researchers get more benefit, especially if they are currently using spreadsheet because they don’t know what Invenias can do.

• Are past assignments being used.  If not a great source of good candidates for a new assignment long list

• Reports: what are being used and is the correct data being put in Invenias for them to populate correctly

• Analytics, if being used: what are being used and is the correct data being put in Invenias for them to populate correctly

• Business Development and programme usage

• Forecasting usage if being used

• Billing usage if being used